The term ‘blended threats’ has become synonymous with viruses in
the last year. Viruses such as Nimda, Goner, Klez and Code Red, which have
caused havoc in the last twelve months, are raising their heads with
alarming regularity.
The fact is, virus writers have got smarter. Authors have come a long
way from simple mass mailers and have created malicious code that is
capable of ‘evolving,’ with dozens of different ways of spreading.
Viruses which can distribute themselves via open network shares, email, or
the Internet are now commonplace, meaning security vendors have to work
doubly hard in order to protect networks.
The Nimda virus is a classic example. Striking in September 2001, Nimda
is one of the most complex viruses to date, using five techniques to
spread in 19 different ways including open network shares. Even just one
virus slipping through the firewall can mean an immense headache for the
IT department. There’s no question that viruses have come a long way,
the question is what is the next step in their evolution? And how can
enterprises defend themselves?
It is a fact that despite this new wave of blended threats, businesses
haven’t seen a truly widespread destructive virus for some time. There
are mixed views on this amongst business and security communities. While
some may feel anti-virus vendors have finally got it right, others feel
complacency is creeping into businesses because of this quiet period of
virus activity. The truth is probably somewhere in between. Can we expect
a blended threat to form the basis of the next big attack that puts
viruses back on the agenda of world business?
The complexity of blended threats is what has really got vendors
working overtime to develop solutions. In addition to the multiple
spreading methods, blended threats can do far more than simply attack a
host PC or network. Often spreading without human intervention, these
viruses can continually scan the Internet looking for vulnerable servers
against which to launch denial-of-service attacks, deface web servers, or
even simply plant Trojan horse programs for later execution.
Equally worrying is the fact that this malicious code has evolved to
morph itself each time it replicates, making some anti-virus software
useless. Businesses need to start looking at solutions that combine
vulnerability management software, intrusion detection and anti-virus
protection at every level of their network to offer a comprehensive and
tiered level of protection. The real jump will come when vendors finally
develop an intelligent defense that looks at the behavior of a piece of
code and deals with it accordingly.
Vendors have gone some way to doing this already with the use of
heuristic and generic detection to effectively stop some viruses before
they are even written. However, developers need to take this software to
the next level. The real hurdle to overcome is for researchers to perfect
a defense that looks for certain operations that are carried out by
inappropriate applications and alerts the IT manager accordingly. For
example, software that can identify applications that are changing or
erasing other applications - or trying to use the Internet for unsolicited
activity - could effectively stop a virus before it becomes a menace.
As great a technological leap as this kind of intelligent software
would be, it still needs to be a last line of defense. The fact is, if
these solutions are looking on the network for suspicious activity - then
the business is already infected.
While there is the fear that blended threats have the potential to
terrorize businesses on a global scale, the encouraging fact is that
security vendors are increasingly working together to halt these viruses,
worms and Trojans in their tracks. It is certainly starting to become a
case of co-operation, rather than competition.
Anti-virus companies have been working together for some time to share
information on virus threats. The next step that has been embraced by many
is to take this relationship to the next level. As well as simply sharing
information, intrusion detection and anti-virus vendors are working
together to develop software that works on both levels to stop viruses -
whatever their method of propagation.
Only half the battle is won through the technology however. The next
big challenge for vendors is to educate businesses on the dangers of
blended threats and get them to act accordingly. It is true that
complacency is creeping into IT departments. Historically we’ve seen a
three-month cycle in the behavior of viruses and businesses. First, a
virus strikes, causing millions in damage and lost productivity; second, a
business puts security back to the top of the agenda; third, virus
activity tails off because up-to-date defenses are in place; fourth, the
business gets complacent - not updating as frequently, or letting the
management of security slip; then another virus strikes causing millions
in damage and lost productivity. And so the cycle goes.
This trend has been bucked recently with businesses not experiencing a
truly damaging virus since the Goner attack in 2001. It is a sad fact,
however, that we cannot put this down to businesses becoming self-aware of
their own complacency and maintaining their focus on security. It is more
likely that they have become increasingly complacent and, as months go by,
will let security slip down their to-do lists. In a recent study,
conducted by Vanson Bourne for Network Associates, 92 per cent of the IT
directors and managers surveyed believed that they had enough resources to
properly deal with their network security but 82 per cent of them had
still been hit with viruses within the last 18 months. The worry is that
when the next strike comes, especially if it is a blended threat, the
consequences could be on a par with the estimated one trillion dollars
damage caused by the LoveLetter virus.
The virus community needs to work at educating businesses about these
threats. Until products which are directly focused on blended threats
become available, businesses need to ensure they are employing protection
at every layer of the network - desktop, gateway and internet. Businesses
also need to be made aware of the dangers of not staying up to date with
virus protection and other bugs and fixes.
One possible solution is that if IT managers do not have time to deal
with security then simply take the management headache away from them. A
number of traditional security vendors are moving towards offering managed
services and solutions, whereby the experts take control of desktop
firewall, perimeter firewall and anti-virus management, hosting the
services remotely. Although not widely embraced by all types of companies,
it is certainly a method for ensuring that protection is up-to-date and
defenses are as watertight as possible. After all, the first people to
know about new viruses are inevitably the virus researchers. If they can
develop a fix for a new blended threat, then it is equally inevitable that
the first people to receive protection will be the customers whose
security they control.
It is widely acknowledged that blended threats provide the single
biggest security risk on the horizon for businesses, and the single
biggest challenge for security vendors. There needs to be an appreciation,
however, that it will take more than simply technology to stave off this
danger. Businesses need to recognize that the human factor will play an
increasingly important part. IT managers need to keep security as a
priority and work closely with vendors of all kinds to make their defenses
impenetrable. The fact that security businesses are looking less at
competition and more at co-operation in developing alliances to combat
blended threats should encourage customers that their network security is
the priority.
Sal Viveros is the U.K. director of the McAfee ASaP managed services
division of security software vendor Network Associates ( www.mcafeeb2b.com).